2005 CPEO Brownfields List Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 24 Mar 2005 23:41:38 -0000
Reply: cpeo-brownfields
Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Report on the NAS Committee meeting on TCE
 
The National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council (NRC) Committee on the Human Health Risks of Trichloroethylene (TCE) held its first meeting in Washington, DC on Wednesday, March 23 and Thursday, March 24, 2005. The Wednesday meeting included two public sessions.

At the morning session, Richard Canady of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy explained that the Inter-Agency Working Group IAWG) - a group which previously discussed the federal view on perchlorate - had asked the NRC to convene the Committee to answer a series of scientific questions related to the toxicity of TCE. The Committee was not, he explained, to conduct a health risk assessment.

Then Peter Preuss and Weihsueh Chiu, of EPA's National Center for Environmental Assessment, explained EPA's 2001 Human Health Risk Assessment as well as the scientific issues they expected the Committee to address. Their remarks were neither a spirited defense of the 2001 Assessment nor a capitulation to EPA's critics at other federal agencies.

Then Canady moderated a panel that took questions from members of the NRC Committee. Panelists included Preuss and representatives of the other IAWG sponsoring agencies, the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, and NASA. The most remarkable thing about the panel was the appearance of enforced consensus. That is, the speakers seemed to take great pains not to disagree with each other. When a question appeared to generate possible differences, they promised to discuss the issue among themselves before getting back to the Committee.

Overall, the morning session was dry and technical, with no indication that the question of TCE's risk to humans has been the subject of intense debate between EPA and federal polluting agencies. It left open the possibility that EPA scientists might not be allowed to defend the groundbreaking work included in the 2001 Assessment, for the sake of presenting a common Executive Branch position to the Committee.

In the afternoon, more than a dozen public speakers addressed the Committee from the open microphone. The Halogenated Solvents Industry Association requested time for three detailed presentations at the next Committee meeting. The TCE Issues Group - an innocuous sounding name for large, private responsible parties (polluters) - requested time for its own scientific presentations. Both groups believe EPA's 2001 Assessment is overly conservative (protective).

Most of the remaining speakers were grassroots activists and local elected officials from TCE-impacted communities in New York, New Jersey, and Tennessee. They told of TCE exposures, from both vapor intrusion and drinking water contamination, in their communities. They reported what they considered large numbers of cancers and other diseases in their neighborhoods. They described the combination of chemicals to which they, their families, and their neighbors are exposed. And they explained that more of them would be protected if EPA's 2001 Assessment were implemented as a health standard for air and water.

The next meeting of the NRC Committee on TCE is April 20, 2005. It is tasked to issue a report in about 18 months.

LS
--
Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
http://www.cpeo.org


_______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields
  Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Oregon firm accused of selling asbestos-contaminated real estate
Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] IC audits --- any data?
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Oregon firm accused of selling asbestos-contaminated real estate
Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] IC audits --- any data?

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index