| From: | "Robert Hersh" <b_hersh@verizon.net> |
| Date: | 26 Oct 2006 19:17:45 -0000 |
| Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
| Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] post from Barry Trilling |
>From Barry Trilling I sense some need here to punish developers willing to take risks on the remediation and development of clearly challenged properties. Peter's examples of "claw-backs" present false hope. How many more projects would have been developed without such "claw-backs?" Defining a general public benefit standard that applies in every case amounts to a one-size-fits-all cookie cutter: it may have appeal to bean counters and for purely academic purposes Barry _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
|
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] incentive evaluation and subsidies Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Subsidies | |
|
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] at the risk of overstimulating the list on incentive evaluation and subsidies Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Affordable housing on Brownfields (Canada) | |