From: | "Peter B. Meyer" <pbmeyer@louisville.edu> |
Date: | 26 Oct 2006 19:18:47 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-BIF] Subsidies |
No, if Peter may respond to Barry, the whole point is NOT to promulgate
one-size-fits-all standards. The claw-back provisions in the economic
development programs I remember from the 1970s, starting with some in
Pennsylvania, did not involve the state government in setting specific
standards, other than minima to qualify for state support, but the
developers or new businesses declarign what they thought they could
acheive as they applied for higher levels of public support. All the
clawbacks did was hold them to commitment they VOLUNTARILY made in
return for public dollars. Who is being punished in such a regime, Barry? Perhaps it was companies whose markets disappeared and who could ot generate the needed number of jobs, but all that I have proposed is a level of mitigation as a condition to which clawbacks might apply -- that is much more under the control of the developers! Peter _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields |
Follow-Ups
|
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] post from Barry Trilling Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] at the risk of overstimulating the list on incentive evaluation and subsidies | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Subsidies Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Subsidies |