From: | "Robert Paterson" <rgfp@mail.utexas.edu> |
Date: | 27 Oct 2006 19:53:52 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-BIF] Affordable housing on Brownfields with residual contamination |
I have mixed feelings on this topic. From a sustainability standpoint, one wants to increase the supply of affordable housing to provide housing access for all at a reasonable rate. This is an important social justice service. However there is also the tension of unfairly making lower income residents carry disproportionate health risks from "residual contamination." The stigma devalued sites offer lower land costs for affordable housing development. But risks may stem from multiple problems --- perhaps in some cases because the science of safe exposure levels is in flux, or a pathway is actually worse than thought and modeled for in the risk assessment (ala vapor intrusion), or because of reliance on engineering and institutional controls to break the exposure pathways (of course many of these LUCs can and will fail since we have limited monitoring capacity for the growing number of closed sites that rely on LUCs (LUCs = ec + ic) and of course Mrs Murphy's rule reigns supreme). I suppose my overall feeling is that if affordable housing is allowed in situations with LUCs (IMO the most likely problem area) then there should be a reasonable time period where the natural attenuation or on-going treatment (e.g., for a conditional closure) makes the residual contamination go completely away (ala residential levels for COCs). This often is not the case, for example, in Texas, municipal settings designations just eliminate the entire groundwater clean up question (LUC declares no subterranean activity that impacts the contaminated groundwater is allowed--ever or until attenuation is demonstrated). What that reasonable time frame might be is an interesting question, but I'm not keen on the use of LUCs where contamination concerns go on for decades and decades with residential on top of it...the 2005 GAO report made clear the gaps in LUC integrity that can happen over time and even in the near term.... Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment (means many things, but this is one key element) implies both inter and intra generational equity...long term residual contamination in residential areas is unfair to subsequent generations that did not create the mess, the existing generations must mitigate the externality within this generation's lifespan to be fair (IMO) Since what is a sustainable community or region is actually a social construction defined by dialogue, this might be a very interesting discussion for communities considering affordable housing brownfields to have with the target residents BEFORE they commit to such development.... Another interesting thread.... Bob Robert G. Paterson Associate Professor Co-Director, Center for Sustainable Development 1 University Station B7500 School of Architecture The University of Texas Austin TX 78712-1160 512-471-0734 Fax 512-471-0716 rgfp@mail.utexas.edu Whatever befalls the earth Befalls the sons and daughters Of the earth. We did not weave the web of life; We are merely a strand in it. Whatever we do to the web. We do it to ourselves. -Chief Seattle (1788-1866) Native American (Suquamish leader) The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify me by telephone at the number above, and destroy the message. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: brownfields-bounces@list.cpeo.org [mailto:brownfields-bounces@list.cpeo.org] On Behalf Of Lenny Siegel Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:10 PM To: Brownfields Internet Forum Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Affordable housing on Brownfields (Canada) [The same practice is common in the U.S., and it poses a dilemma. "Affordable" housing is needed, but should brownfields sites, many of which end up with residual contamination, be relegated to poor people?] Press Release Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing October 26, 2006 Affordable housing targeted to brownfield sites TORONTO, /CNW/ - The Government of Canada and the Government of Ontario today allocated funding for a minimum of 300 units under the Canada-Ontario Affordable Housing Program to be built specifically on cleaned-up brownfield sites. The announcement of the Affordable Housing Program - Brownfields Initiative was made today by the Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Social Development Canada, and John Gerretsen, Ontario's Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. "Canada's new government is proud to contribute to the development of new affordable housing units at Toronto's brownfield sites that are now clean, green and safe," said Minister Finley. "We will be providing hundreds of families with secure, affordable housing and a better quality of life, and at the same time breathing new neighbourhood life into an area that has been dormant." ... For the entire release, see http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2006/26/c4822.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Re-Working the Thinking on Brownfields Subsidies Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Re-Working the Thinking on Brownfields Subsidies | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Affordable housing on Brownfields (Canada) Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Brownfields Digest, Vol 26, Issue 23 |