From: | bobh@np.craigslist.org |
Date: | 29 May 2007 14:53:54 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] Albany, NY --- reforming NY state brownfields law |
Act on brownfields Albany, NY Times Union May 29, 2007 New York's landmark 2003 brownfield law is flawed and needs fixing. It also happens to be a textbook example of what can go wrong when negotiations are held in the middle of the night, rather than in public, as Governor Spitzer now insists, as he and legislative leaders try to reach agreement on pending issues. The law was rushed through during one of the Legislature's infamous marathon sessions, albeit with the best of intentions. Lawmakers had hoped to spur development of contaminated sites, mostly in urban areas and upstate, by offering developers generous tax incentives to build there. But it didn't take long before the flaws were exposed. Tax credits of up to 22 percent were pegged not only to a developer's cost of cleaning up a contaminated site, but also to the cost of construction itself. That meant big developers in Manhattan could save millions of dollars even if their cleanup costs were relatively modest. A case in point: The firm behind the New York Times Tower in midtown Manhattan applied for $170 million in tax credits for the $850 million project, even though cleanup costs were less than $1 million. For the entire editorial, see: http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=592766&category=OPINION&newsdate=5/29/2007 _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Dunkirk, NY area-wide brownfields planning Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Warren, MI --- Tax subsidy debated for greyfield redevelopment | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Dunkirk, NY area-wide brownfields planning Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Warren, MI --- Tax subsidy debated for greyfield redevelopment |