From: | Lenny Siegel <lennysiegel@gmail.com> |
Date: | 15 Jun 2007 20:20:45 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-BIF] Recent law review articles of interest |
************ Gerrit-Jan Knaap and John W. Frece, 2007. SMART GROWTH IN MARYLAND: LOOKINGFORWARD AND LOOKING BACK. 43 Idaho L. Rev. 445From the conclusion:"While the idea that the state should not underwrite urban sprawl remains a valid concept, the hope that the state budget could be used to curtail urban sprawl has not been fulfilled. The disappointment stems from a number of factors. First, sprawl has many causes, and the only effective way to address sprawl is through planning. Maryland's Smart Growth laws were never integrated into its planning laws. Second, many if not most of the funds that finance sprawl come from local and private sources. It is unlikely that the targeting or removal of state subsidies alone will ever have a significant effect on sprawl without complementary land use plans and regulations. Finally, the state budget remains largely under the control of the governor. If the control of sprawl is contingent on the administration of the state budget, then control of sprawl is overly contingent on support for this effort from the state administration." I have been paying some attention to Maryland lately. Military base realignments - which CPEO covers on our Installation Reuse Forum listserve - are going to bring tens of thousands of additional jobs to the state, along the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. This will swamp the anti-sprawl policies unless more is done to promote the repopulation of the Maryland's largest urban center, Baltimore. I recently visited middle east Baltimore, and I was surprised by the large number of apparently reusable (even attractive!), but boarded/bricked up row houses. There is major redevelopment underway in the area around Johns Hopkins University, so its reasonable to expect some level of neighborhood revitalization. But for these neighborhoods to compete with suburban greenfields, to reverse the momentum for additional sprawl, there needs to be a more comprehensive effort to address all of the issues that have made the area a forgotten community: environment, race, economics, education, transportation, etc. It may be the officials are already addressing many of these questions, but I believe if the state wants to overcome sprawl it needs to vigorously promote the alternative. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Recent law review articles of interest Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] General Dynamics, Woodbridge, New Jersey | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Recent law review articles of interest Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] General Dynamics, Woodbridge, New Jersey |