From: | Lenny Siegel <lennysiegel@gmail.com> |
Date: | 17 Oct 2007 22:24:57 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] Siegel Superfund Testimony |
REPLENISHING THE SUPERFUND WOULD BE A GIANT STEP FORWARD IN PROTECTING
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Testimony by Lenny Siegel Executive Director Center for Public Environmental Oversight before theSubcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Health October 17, 2007For the full 11-page, 7.2 MB PDF version of the testimony, see http://www.cpeo.org/pubs/Superfundtestimony.pdf Executive SummaryOver the past quarter century, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly known as Superfund, has been an important instrument for protecting public health and the environment in the United States. Its tools - addressing response, compensation, and liability - are like the proverbial three-legged stool. At many sites, CERCLA collapses when one of those tools is missing. Across the country, since the Superfund account was depleted, seriously contaminated sites have suffered from inadequate cleanup, inefficiencies, and inequities. I highlight four sites, all of which I have visited within the past year, to illustrate what the shortage of Fund money means to the people who live, work, or attend school on or near the some of the nation's most contaminated properties. * At the Orion Park Military Housing Area, Mountain View, California, the shortage of Fund resources has severely handicapped U.S. EPA's ability to address off-site sources, preventing it from requiring the Navy to conduct on-site cleanup and forcing NASA to expend its own resources on contamination from the site. Contamination prevented the development of new military housing on the site, and military personnel at the planned Armed Forces Reserve training complex will be at long-term risk from vapor intrusion, the migration of subsurface contamination into buildings. * In Victor, New York trichloroethylene (TCE) from apparent illegal dumping has poisoned private wells and released toxic vapors into homes. A Fund-led cleanup could protect the impacted families, but the Superfund does not have enough money for it to make much sense even to add the site to the National Priorities List (NPL). * In Ambler, Pennsylvania, EPA successfully capped two asbestos waste pile sites 14 years ago, but remaining piles, not on the NPL, are slated for redevelopment. Neighbors, fearing that current exposures will be increased with the release of development-associated asbestos dust, would like EPA to list the site and fund the response, but as long as the Fund is depleted, this appears unlikely. * There is consensus support for the dredging of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts, a Superfund "mega-site." However, inadequate funding has forced an inefficient start-and-stop cleanup that is currently slated to stretch out a quarter century. Today, both at sites already dependent upon EPA funding and those that should be added to the National Priorities List, cleanup is slow and inefficient, and expenses are often borne by third parties. Replenishing the fund would be a giant step forward in recognizing, investigating, and remediating the most contaminated sites in America. -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] California Vapor Intrusion Law Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Information Technology High School (NY) | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] California Vapor Intrusion Law Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Information Technology High School (NY) |