From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 1 May 2009 12:00:04 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: RE: Illinois proposal for disclosure of watercontamination]] |
From: Boss, Randy R NWD02 <Randy.R.Boss@usace.army.mil>This discussion might be fairly approached in the following way. The new owner of a 'Brownfields property should have an upper monetary limit that he/she should pay for to do proper remediation as the property is developed. Beyond that monetary limit, the previous owner should then be held responsible. With that approach, the new buyer could categorize the development costs no matter how much pollution is eventually found at the site. -----Original Message----- From: brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org [mailto:brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org] On Behalf Of Lenny Siegel Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 1:15 PM To: Brownfields Internet Forum Subject: [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: Illinois proposal for disclosure of watercontamination] From: Walsh, William <WALSHW@pepperlaw.com> I am torn over this proposal. If there was not a tendency to kill the messenger (given the broad liability laws), I might be less concerned.But if there is notice filed and the regulators go against the notifier, then no one is going develop these areas.The original thrust of brownfields was not to clean up Brownfields sites, but to separate new development from liability and allow the new developer to proceed with an economically beneficial endeavor. The price included some limited clean up to prevent exposure to the new users of the property. The discussion over the last few days, suggests that Larry and others think that somehow this will be a vehicle to require excavation and redisposal (if not treatment) of the historic wastes. My simple view is that if you want something beneficial such as a release from future liability for contamination that you did not cause, the processshould require you to pay something, but not as much as the person who caused the contamination. I would divide simple property transfers from a true brownfields where there is a release of liability. If I purchase a property that has contamination onsite and I do not seek a release of liability, and I do not disclose, then I assume liability as a new owner.If I purchase the property and want a release of liability, then obviously, I must disclose. If one requires any purchaser to disclose groundwater or soil contamination, then no one will purchase. If one requires the current owner to disclose (and the current owner did not cause the contamination), then although the current owner may be legally liable, it is in fact punishing an innocent party. I know of no environmental program that requires monitoring by the original disposer to determine if there is a release. In most transactions, there is a phase 1 and if there is any reasonable evidence of contamination, the purchaser seeks and obtains an indemnification for that past contamination. So the bad actor remains liable. If either the original owner or purchase must report, why proceed. What I think you want is a system that encourages (i.e., provides incentives for) sampling and cleanup, without requiring a mind-boggling and very expensive set of studies that will at the end of the day say that the remedy required is what everyone thought was necessary after looking at it for a week. William J. Walsh Pepper Hamilton LLP 600 Fourteenth Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 220-1424 -direct (202) 220-1665 - fax walshw@pepperlaw.com -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: Illinois proposal for disclosure of water contamination] Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Disclosure Obligations | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Proceedings of the National Forum on Vapor Intrusion Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Disclosure Obligations |