From: | "Bruce-Sean Reshen" <reshen@mindspring.com> |
Date: | Fri, 1 May 2009 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men |
Surely Lenny's viewpoint is one we can all support. It is wonderful to debate among ourselves, but what we really need is to include the regulators who must assist in determining the viability of the best of our ideas and then push for regulatory and/or congressional approval. Bruce Bruce-Sean Reshen p. 203-259-1850 c. 917-757-5925 This communication may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or return email and, delete the message from their computer. -----Original Message----- From: brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org [mailto:brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org] On Behalf Of Lenny Siegel Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:49 PM To: Brownfields Internet Forum Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men Bill Walsh wrote, > The original thrust of brownfields was not to clean up Brownfields > sites, but to separate new development from liability and allow the new > developer to proceed with an economically beneficial endeavor. The All Appropriate Inquiries Negotiated Rulemaking Committee often compared ourselves to the Six Blind Men and the Elephant. For those who don't remember their early education, this is a story (poem?) that illustrates that where one stands depends upon where one sits. Some people think the primary purpose of brownfields programs is liability relief. Some think it's primarily property redevelopment. Some think it's neighborhood revitalization. To others, it's environmental cleanup. And yet others see it as an opportunity to practice their professional skills. I believe that we can develop brownfields policies that serve all those goals. That is, we don't all have agree which of those objectives is most important to work together to devise win-win brownfields strategies. I therefore propose that U.S. EPA convene a multi-stakeholder dialogue to review the universe of cleanup programs to figure how to improve disclosure and environmental response while still rewarding those who seek to combine cleanup and redevelopment. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Burlington RR v. US |