2009 CPEO Brownfields List Archive

From: "Bruce-Sean Reshen" <reshen@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Reply: cpeo-brownfields
Subject: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men
 
Surely Lenny's viewpoint is one we can all support.  It is wonderful to
debate among ourselves, but what we really need is to include the
regulators who must assist  in determining the viability of the best of
our ideas and then push for regulatory and/or congressional approval.

Bruce

Bruce-Sean Reshen
p. 203-259-1850
c. 917-757-5925
 
This communication may contain information that is legally privileged,
confidential or exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Anyone who receives this
message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or
return email and, delete the message from their computer.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org
[mailto:brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org] On Behalf Of Lenny Siegel
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:49 PM
To: Brownfields Internet Forum
Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men

Bill Walsh wrote,

> The original thrust of brownfields was not to clean up Brownfields
> sites, but to separate new development from liability and allow the
new
> developer to proceed with an economically beneficial endeavor.  

The All Appropriate Inquiries Negotiated Rulemaking Committee often 
compared ourselves to the Six Blind Men and the Elephant. For those who 
don't remember their early education, this is a story (poem?) that 
illustrates that where one stands depends upon where one sits.

Some people think the primary purpose of brownfields programs is 
liability relief. Some think it's primarily property redevelopment. Some

think it's neighborhood revitalization. To others, it's environmental 
cleanup. And yet others see it as an opportunity to practice their 
professional skills.

I believe that we can develop brownfields policies that serve all those 
goals. That is, we don't all have agree which of those objectives is 
most important to work together to devise win-win brownfields
strategies.

I therefore propose that U.S. EPA convene a multi-stakeholder dialogue 
to review the universe of cleanup programs to figure how to improve 
disclosure and environmental response while still rewarding those who 
seek to combine cleanup and redevelopment.

Lenny
-- 


Lenny Siegel
Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
a project of the Pacific Studies Center
278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org



_______________________________________________
Brownfields mailing list
Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org
http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org

_______________________________________________
Brownfields mailing list
Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org
http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org

  References
  Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men
Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Six blind men
Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Burlington RR v. US

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index