Re: [CPEO-BIF] EPA's Inspector General reviews All Appropriate Inquiries reports

[Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>]

This is an important subject. Most of the usual suspects have already 
chimed in. I invite other members of this list to join the discussion. I 
would particularly like to hear from government officials. Since many 
agencies discourage statements that might be misinterpreted as official, 
I am willing to anonymize submissions.

Personally, I don't think the solution lies in paying environmental 
professionals more or restricting who might conduct a Phase One. Those 
might be attractive options in their own right.

But I believe we have to recognize that environmental protection is 
inherently a government function. It is not inherently protective of 
public health and the environment to allow private consultants, no 
matter how qualified and how well paid, to conduct environmental 
assessments that are questioned only if someone goes to court down the road.

The lesson of the Inspector General's report is that government 
officials, directly accountable to the public, need to oversee site 
assessments. It means that assessments should routinely be made 
available to the public, and that environmental regulators should check 
all of them against a checklist - as the Inspector General's office did. 
A percentage should be fully audited. To me, this is the best way to 
ensure quality.

Lenny

--


Lenny Siegel
Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
a project of the Pacific Studies Center
278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org



_______________________________________________
Brownfields mailing list
Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org
http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org