From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 May 2005 15:39:15 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) want closure |
Base closure is California city's dream Pentagon plan would clear way for development By Bobby Caina Calvan Boston Globe Correspondent May 23, 2005 CONCORD, Calif. -- When the Pentagon announced this month its latest list of proposed base closings, people in this San Francisco suburb, like so many others across the country, hoped for the best. But while other communities nationwide fretted about the possible shutdown of their military installations, Concord civic leaders took a seemingly peculiar step: They lobbied the Pentagon to close the city's naval weapons station. Concord wants the site because the facility occupies 13,000 acres of waterfront, marshland, and inland meadows that compose one of the largest remaining undeveloped properties in the heavily urbanized San Francisco Bay Area. The Pentagon obliged, saying on May 13 that it would release 5,100 acres of prime real estate at the weapons station to the civilian sector as part of the Pentagon's latest round of base realignment and closure recommendations. ... For the entire article http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/05/23/base_closure_is_california_citys_dream -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Brooks AFB (TX) not very "dirty" Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Eielson AFB (AK) - Realignment worse than closure? | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Brooks AFB (TX) not very "dirty" Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Eielson AFB (AK) - Realignment worse than closure? |