From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 May 2005 16:04:17 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Eielson AFB (AK) - Realignment worse than closure? |
The significance of the local efforts to "save Eielson" Air Force Base
in central Alaska, cited in the article excerpted and linked below, is
that the Pentagon has not proposed to close it. Rather, it has proposed
a realignment that would leave two Air National Guard units at the base.
Nevertheless, the action could reduce employment there by 4,711 jobs. The 19,790-acre base is on the Superfund "National Priorities List." Nearly $56 million has been spent on cleanup thus far, and the Air Force officially expects to spend $8.4 million more. Downsizing the operations at Eielson will dramatically reduce the Air Force's economic contribution to the Fairbanks area without, apparently, freeing up any land for alternative use. Operated by an Air National Guard skeleton crew, the base will remain an Air Force base with plans for only limited cleanup, based upon its continued as an airfield. Thus, from a local point of view, realignment could be worse than closure. That is, the area would be better able to recover from the departure of the active Air Force if the base were actually closed. This is not the only effective closure without land transfer on the Pentagon's BRAC 2005 list. Brunswick Naval Air Station in Maine, for example, is slated to lose 4,266 jobs, but the airfield will remain operational - apparently with no planes based there. Lenny *** Help save Eielson Fairbanks Daily News-Miner May 22, 2005 As the local effort to spare Eielson Air Force Base from a massive reduction in its size increases day to day, individual residents of the Fairbanks North Star Borough may be wondering if there's anything that one ordinary citizen can do. Joe and Jane Fairbanks, perhaps sitting inside on this cloudy, drizzly Interior weekend, might be thinking that the work of saving Eielson is better left to those who know the particulars about Eielson's strategic importance, its capabilities and the details of the Defense Department's decision to all but close the base. While the military importance of Eielson may best be left for the experts, there are ways that Joe and Jane Fairbanks and others in this town can get involved in the drive to save our Air Force neighbor. ... For the entire article, see http://www.news-miner.com/Stories/0,1413,113~7252~2882791,00.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) want closure Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Former Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (IL) | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) want closure Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Former Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (IL) |