2005 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 5 Jul 2005 20:18:47 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] "Don't Let Pentagon Dump On Us" - Groton, CT
 
Don't Let Pentagon Dump On Us

By PHILIP L. SUSSLER
New London Day (CT)
July 3, 2005

Connecticut can't let the Pentagon duck the cleanup costs it is
responsible for at the sub base.

So far, in justifying closure of the base, the Pentagon has decided to
ignore almost all the associated environmental cleanup costs. The
Defense Department's BRAC recommendation assumes that the environmental
cleanup obligation and cost is about the same whether the base remains
open or is closed abruptly and, therefore, the costs are treated as a
wash. 

But what is the standard for cleanup? The standard for cleanup for
continued use as a military base is much lower and less costly than it
is for reuse of the base property for commercial or residential
purposes. 

...

For the entire column, see
http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=CA17CC27-3A4B-4D51-8EAA-BCF9BCC7FB6E

-- 


Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Former Chanute Air Force Base (IL)
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Coast Guart questions Otis ANG Base (MA) closure
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Former Chanute Air Force Base (IL)
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Coast Guart questions Otis ANG Base (MA) closure

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index