From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 4 Oct 2005 16:39:16 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Cecil Field (FL) "encroachment" |
[The 2005 BRAC Commission broke new legal ground in deciding to move
jets from Virginia to Florida IF homes are not removed from certain
areas near the Ocean Naval Air Station, in Virginia Beach. Now it turns
out that Cecil Field (Jacksonville, Florida) has similar problems. I
don't know whether the BRAC process has the flexibility that will allow
the Navy to consider the relative risks and benefits of these two and
other locations. - LS] Population grows in Cecil's crash zone By DAVID DECAMP The Times-Union (Jacksonville, FL) October 4, 2005 Jacksonville Mayor John Peyton and Florida's advocates to reopen Cecil Field said no one lived in crash zones near the former Navy base. No people. Just pine trees. Peyton and retired Adm. Robert Natter, the state lobbyist, also helped convince a federal commission that Jacksonville had kept using the same building restrictions near Cecil. They were wrong. In fact, up to 925 housing units -- including newer homes in Bent Creek and older houses off Nathan Hale Road -- sit in accident-potential zones, city officials said after a Times-Union review of property records. ... For the entire article, see http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/100405/met_19941313.shtml
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Oceana (VA) - more homes at risk Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Topsham Navy Annex | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Oceana (VA) - more homes at risk Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Topsham Navy Annex |