2005 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: lsiegel@cpeo.org
Date: 4 Oct 2005 18:42:49 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Topsham Navy Annex
 
Topsham wants its own authority (ME)

Town's is seen as having less complicated redevelopment issues than
Brunswick Naval Air Station.

Darcie Moore
Brunswick Times Record (ME)
October 4, 2005

TOPSHAM ? Until Thursday, state and local officials worked under the
assumption that one local redevelopment authority would represent both
Brunswick and Topsham as the federal government moves ahead with plans
to close Brunswick Naval Air Station. 

A local redevelopment authority would serve as the single point of
contact between local interests and the military, and once in place, the
authority would begin the process of redevelopment planning. 

However, at a Topsham Board of Selectmen meeting on Thursday, Town
Manager Gary Brown summarized a meeting earlier that day with a top Navy
base closure representative that included discussions about Topsham
having its own local redevelopment authority. 
...

For the entire article, see
http://www.timesrecord.com/website/main.nsf/news.nsf/0/A2BB421F63277D6F05257090005893CC?Opendocument

-- 


Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Cecil Field (FL) "encroachment"
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Hunters Point - San Francisco police lab to be evicted
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Cecil Field (FL) "encroachment"
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Hunters Point - San Francisco police lab to be evicted

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index