From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 27 Dec 2005 20:29:38 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] The Ft. Monmouth (NJ) challenge |
BRAC closing offers challenges to communities, developers
After months of public hearings, study and research (not to mention nonstop lobbying), the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure list is now a matter of law. Land developers and homebuilders are beginning to eye the bases picked for decommissioning as tempting development opportunities. Nearly 200 facilities have been selected for closure or realignment, including Fort Monmouth. Decommissioned bases can offer unique development potential for communities as well as opportunities for developers and builders that understand the complexities of base reuse to jump into the process early. But the challenges are also evident: environmental contamination, inadequate infrastructure, buildings that aren't up to code and, occasionally, unexploded weaponry that must be dealt with. Most bases need substantial reconfiguration to become suitable for private development. Before being decommissioned, bases must first be "normalized." ... For the entire column, see http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051227/OPINION/512270303/1030/POLITICS -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Ingleside (TX) and Pascagoula (MS) too Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Brunswick Naval Air Station (ME) proposals | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Ingleside (TX) and Pascagoula (MS) too Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Brunswick Naval Air Station (ME) proposals |