From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 19 Jan 2006 16:53:46 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Brunswick (ME) options |
Options eyed for land at air base By DENNIS HOEY Portland Press Herald (ME) January 19, 2006 BRUNSWICK - Brunswick has no legal authority to force the U.S. Navy to return land that it seized 60 years ago to create an air base, a legal expert said Wednesday, but the town could rezone the land as open space to protect the original Town Commons. James T. Kilbreth, an attorney with Verrill and Dana in Portland, told the Local Redevelopment Authority that the eminent domain taking of more than 700 acres to create the Brunswick Naval Air Station did not include a reversionary clause. That means the federal government has no legal obligation to give the land back to the town. Authority members, including Chairman Martin Wilk, said they would consider recommending that some of that land be rezoned once the air base closes. ... For the entire article, see http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/coast/060119bnas.shtml -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Pascagoula (MS) "not up for grabs just yet" Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] More cleanup required at Watertown Arsenal (MA) | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Pascagoula (MS) "not up for grabs just yet" Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] More cleanup required at Watertown Arsenal (MA) |