From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 11 Apr 2006 20:36:04 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Oceana Naval Air Station (VA) and the BRAC recommendation |
Naval station's fate comes down to one sentence - all 238 words of itBy DALE EISMAN The Virginian-Pilot April 11, 2006 WASHINGTON — Eight months after a federal base-closing commission declared that "the future of naval aviation is not Naval Air Station Oceana," the fate of the Virginia Beach base likely hinges on how an obscure bureaucracy headed by a temporary appointee interprets a single sentence. And what a sentence it is. The Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission crammed its design for Oceana's future into a 238-word behemoth, covering more than 13 lines in its final report. A second sentence, comparatively modest at 198 words, spells out how the Navy's principal East Coast jet base could be shifted to a former Navy facility in Florida if the commission's directives on Oceana aren’t satisfied. ... For the entire article, see http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/print.cfm?story=102833&ran=19843 --
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Concord Naval Weapons Station (CA) arsenic Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] IRF begins second year with LOWER charges | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Concord Naval Weapons Station (CA) arsenic Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] IRF begins second year with LOWER charges |