2006 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 11 Apr 2006 20:36:04 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Oceana Naval Air Station (VA) and the BRAC recommendation
 
Naval station's fate comes down to one sentence - all 238 words of it

By DALE EISMAN
The Virginian-Pilot
April 11, 2006


WASHINGTON — Eight months after a federal base-closing commission declared that "the future of naval aviation is not Naval Air Station Oceana," the fate of the Virginia Beach base likely hinges on how an obscure bureaucracy headed by a temporary appointee interprets a single sentence.


And what a sentence it is. The Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission crammed its design for Oceana's future into a 238-word behemoth, covering more than 13 lines in its final report.

A second sentence, comparatively modest at 198 words, spells out how the Navy's principal East Coast jet base could be shifted to a former Navy facility in Florida if the commission's directives on Oceana aren’t satisfied.

...

For the entire article, see
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/print.cfm?story=102833&ran=19843

--


Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org


_______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Concord Naval Weapons Station (CA) arsenic
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] IRF begins second year with LOWER charges
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Concord Naval Weapons Station (CA) arsenic
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] IRF begins second year with LOWER charges

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index