From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Mon, 05 Dec 1994 11:02:08 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: ROCKET TOXICS |
AIR FORCE STUDY CALCULATES OZONE DEPLETION FROM ROCKET LAUNCHES NASA continues to play down the environmental impact of solid rocket motors - particularly their release of ozone-depleting chlorine in the stratosphere. However, , the Los Angeles-based Space and Missile Systems Center, a branch of the Air Force Materiel Command, is taking the issue seriously. In November it released a report, prepared by the Aerospace Corporation, on "Stratospheric Ozone Reactive Chemicals Generated by Space Launches Worldwide." Based upon the known characteristics of existing launch vehicles, Aerospace has calculated the chlorine deposition of a typical launch for each type of vehicle. Liquid-fueled rockets, such as the Russian Proton and Energia and the Chinese Long March, are not profiled, because they do not release chlorine. Chlorine release (tons) by altitude Launch Vehicle 0-15 km 15-60 km 0-60 km Titan IV 78 48 126 Titan IV with SRMU 90 55 145 Delta II 17 8 25 Atlas IIAS 6 3 9 MX na 6 na MinuteMan III na 2 na Pegasus/Taurus 0/10 4 4/14 Shuttle 147 79 226 Ariane 5 50 57 107 H1 6 3 9 H2 22 11 33 Aerospace also calculates the aluminum oxide releases per launch, but its impact on the ozone layer is unknown. The report also develops annual and long-term profiles of the chlorine loading from solid-rocket launches based upon anticipated launch rates. It says, "Worldwide space launches contribute over 800 tons of chlorine and 1000 tons of alumina particles to the stratosphere annually. This represents .25% of the total inorganic chlorine produce in the stratosphere which meets with ozone." Aerospace carefully compares the timing of the impact of rocket exhaust and terrestrial releases of ozone-depleting substances, such a chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs): "CFCs released at sea level require one to two years to reach the stratosphere. CFCs have lifetimes of 50 to 100 years, so the active chlorine generated by this CFC-release will continue to build up for several years. Subsequent releases will further increase the atmospheric chlorine. If releases cease, the atmospheric chlorine will fall to half the peak level in 50 to 100 years. CFCs have been released for several decades at an increasing rate, so the atmospheric levels of inorganic chlorine from this source have already accumulated. IN CONTRAST, INORGANIC CHLORINE RELEASED IN THE STRATOSPHERE BY A ROCKET RESULTS IN AN IMMEDIATE INCREASE IN ORGANIC CHLORINE." [emphasis added] Aerospace documents the continuing decrease in the use of ozone- depleting compounds such as CFCs, listing actual and projected use (not releases) for the Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC); the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), including the SMC; and a slightly dated global estimate from the World Meteorological Organization. Please note that this table does not present the weighted ozone-depleting potential, just a raw measure of releases. Use of Ozone-Depleting Compounds (tons) Year SMC AFMC World 1991 1,400 2,019,000 1992 29 1,120 2,049,000 1993 51 700 1,639,000 1994 51 100 1,639,000 1995 24 24 1,081,500 1996 8 8 1,081,500 1997 8 8 731,500 1998 8 8 731,500 1999 8 8 731,500 2000 0 0 320,000 Aerospace concludes, "Because the atmospheric lifetime of a typical CFC is 50-100 years, the backlog of accumulated CFCs in the atmosphere will continue to contribute close to 300,000 tons of inorganic chlorine annually well into the next century. This annual contribution is not projected to drop to half its current level until between 2050 and 2100. This means that projected launch-generated inorganic chlorine will rise to a level approaching 0.5 percent of the annual level introduced by the backlog of accumulated CFC. However, new anthropogenic releases of chlorine, while still a small fraction of what is stored in the atmosphere, will soon be dominated by launch-generated inorganic chlorine." That is, the U.S. Air Force and its contractor are warning: As the world cuts back on the use and release of CFC's, solid-rocket launches will soon become dominant new source of chlorine in the stratosphere. | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: ROCKET TOXICS Next by Date: Re: ROCKET TOXICS | |
Prev by Thread: ROCKET TOXICS Next by Thread: Re: ROCKET TOXICS |