From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Mon, 05 Dec 1994 11:00:43 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | ROCKET TOXICS |
NO FREE LAUNCH In August, 1990, the National Toxics Campaign Fund published my (Lenny Siegel's) report, NO FREE LAUNCH, pointing out that the the burning of solid rocket fuel, whether in testing, waste disposal, launching, or demilitarization, was hazardous to the environment. Solid rocket fuel is made up principally of aluminum powder and ammonium perchlorate. When it burns, aluminum oxide and hydrogen chloride are emitted. Hydrogen chloride becomes hydrochloric acid in the presence of water - thus the emissions cause acid precipitation. The general toxicity of aluminum oxide is under debate, but there is clear evidence of hazards in an acidic environment, such as the exhaust from a solid rocket motor. When solid rocket motors burn in the stratosphere, the hydrogen chloride quickly breaks down into ozone-depleting chloride ions. (The ozone-depleting potential of the aluminum oxide remains to be researched.) Consequently, space shuttle launches are the largest single source of ozone- depletion, though they are dwarfed by the combined effect of global industrial releases of chlorofluorocarbons. Solid rockets are used in battlefield missiles, intercontinental ballistic missiles, sea-launched ballistic missiles, and large launch motors such as the strap-on boosters for the space shuttle, which uses a liquid fuel main engine. When Congress terminated NASA's proposed Advanced Solid Rocket Motor, a larger shuttle booster, last year, the environmental hazards were one of the objections put forward by opponents. In the near future I will be posting items that summarize new findings and issues involving solid rocket motors. I would appreciate it if anyone else with such information would post it as well, as a response to this item. Lenny Siegel CAREER/PRO and Pacific Studies Center |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Documents vs. Action Next by Date: Re: ROCKET TOXICS | |
Prev by Thread: Documents vs. Action Next by Thread: Re: ROCKET TOXICS |