From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 09 Dec 1994 15:16:59 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: ROCKET TOXICS |
TEXANS OPPOSE OPEN ROCKET BURNING When Colorado residents opposed the open-burning of Pershing II solid rocket motors at the Army's Pueblo Depot Activity, the Army continued the practice at the Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant (LAAP) near Karnack, Texas - just west of Shreveport, Louisiana. Now, with weapons manufacture there concluded, the Army and the contractor-operator of LAAP, Thiokol, propose to "dispose" of more than two thousand small solid rockets - 2,000 high velocity aerial rockets and 144 Sparrow rockets - through open burning. In opposition to the burning stand the users of adjacent Caddo Lake, the "only natural lake" in Texas, habitat for a large number of plant and animal species, and water supply for several cities. Organizations such as the Lone Star chapter of the Sierra Club and the Uncertain Audubon Society have retained a law firm to contest the facility's permit request. Thiokol says the the entire job will release a total of 23 tons of carbon dioxide, 4 tons of nitrogen, and 1.3 tons of chlorine, and that pollution will be less hazardous compared to releases from the plant when it was in operation. Opponents say that open burning may destroy valuable wetlands, endanger fish, and contribute to higher acid levels in Caddo Lake. The uncontrolled burning of toxic waste will undermine efforts to bring tourism and jobs to the area. And they point out, other disposal methods are available. They are not convinced by comparisons to past contamination: Longhorn is a Superfund site, the cleanup of which is expected to cost $127 million. | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: DEFENSE BUDGET IN-FIGHT Next by Date: Re: REPUBLICAN BUDGET PROPOSAL | |
Prev by Thread: Re: ROCKET TOXICS Next by Thread: Panama: Help in requesting document |