1994 CPEO Military List Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 1994 09:20:28 -0800 (PST)
Reply: cpeo-military
Subject: Re: Re: re: BASE CLOSURE Pease Ruling
The Presidio case is not unique. Moffett, for example, is a fed-to-fed
transfer. It's up the receiving agency (the Park Service or NASA) to
negotiate a Memorandum of Agreement that clearly defines the military's
liability, responsibility, and knowledge prior to the transfer.

The Pease decision applies when the Park Service wants to lease portions of
the property. It won't be able to enter into any long-term agreements until
the parcel in question passes muster under CERFA: the Finding of Suitability to

There is a Federal Task Force that looks closely at these issues. (It met
in SF in January.) And The California Base Closure Environmental Advisory
Committee looks at these issues, in less detail, as well. Once the lawyers
get involved, it gets very complicated.

Lenny Siegel

  Prev by Date: Re: RAB Guidelines
Next by Date: Re: RAB history
  Prev by Thread: Re: re: BASE CLOSURE Pease Ruling
Next by Thread: RAB history

CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index