Re: compromises etc.

[Linda_Vrabel@qmgate.arc.nasa.gov]

Posting from Linda Vrabel <Linda_Vrabel@qmgate.arc.nasa.gov>

 Reply to: RE>compromises etc.

Network etiquette suggests that personnel interchanges (i.e. correspondence
and responses) should be conducted off the list and not sent everyone. I have
neither the time nor the funding to review your personal mail.

--------------------------------------
Date: 3/14/95 6:37 AM
To: Linda Vrabel
From: cpro.military
Marylia,
To take this dialogue a little further, how do we define goals over this 
network, or can we? Is this this a good forum to discuss compromises?

I am new to this electronic democracy, and I really don't know the answers.
Speak with you soon,
Peter

------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by qmgate.arc.nasa.gov with SMTP;14 Mar 1995 06:36:29 U
Received: (from notes) by cdp.igc.org (8.6.11/Revision: 1.194 ) id
BAA23875 for "conf-cpro.military"; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 01:36:34 -0800
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 22:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: Conference "cpro.military" <careerpro@igc.org>
From: Peter Strauss <pstrauss@igc.org>
Subject: compromises etc.
To: Recipients of conference <careerpro@igc.org>
Message-ID: <APC&1'0'8af96525'1ba@igc.org>
X-Gateway: conf2mail@igc.org
Errors-To: owner-careerpro@igc.org
Precedence: bulk
Lines: 7