From: | zweifel@nexus.chapman.edu |
Date: | 01 Jun 1995 10:34:13 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | BTEX remediation |
Posting from Don Zweifel <zweifel@nexus.chapman.edu> Jeffrey, In ground or in-situ bioremediation is a valid gambit in the battle to remove VOCs or volatile organic compounds. At MCAS, El Toro, Ca. we are about to implement a pilot project that may be exceedingly effective in remediating the TCE and benzene contamination plumes. Essentially it involves injecting air via wells, into the AOC or area of concern, to assist the indigenous aerobic micro-organisms to attack and reduce these molecules into chemically inert constituents. The tried and true pump-and-treat methodology is usually a more expeditious way of remediation, however it is usually far less cost-effective than in-situ bioremediation. We believe that the USEPA regards bioremediation as an `innovative technology' and will provide a special grant if the site is considered `DOIT' worthy. If Westover AFB is on the NPL (National Priority List) as a CERCLA Superfund site then you'll have a USEPA program manager. A query to him/her re the feasibilty of `DOIT' implementation might be worth consideration. On an added note, may we iterate that the level of contamination is of critical importance as to whether bioremediation can be effective or not. If the concentration is too high then this process probably cannot be instituted. What levels of contamination have been determined? Don Zweifel |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: 20% CAP ON D.E.R.A. STUDY MONEY Next by Date: Re: BTEX remediation | |
Prev by Thread: 20% CAP ON D.E.R.A. STUDY MONEY Next by Thread: Re: BTEX remediation |