From: | zweifel@nexus.chapman.edu |
Date: | 16 Jul 1995 18:36:13 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Cal/EPA Base Closure Env. Advisory Group meeting. |
Posting from Don Zweifel <zweifel@nexus.chapman.edu> Subject: Cal/EPA Base Closure Env. Advisory Group meeting. To: Fellow net recipients Our advisory panel met on 12 July 1995 at San Francisco State University. We were privileged to hear Julie Anderson speak on behalf of the USEPA's Region IX as one of its directors. Julie indicated that her organization has been mandated to establish new regulations pertaining to UXO's or Unexploded Ordnance by 31 Oct. of this year. " A UXO may be categorized as corrosive, toxic, ignitable and/or reactive, any one of which would be actionable," she stated. The question one might ask is when do UXO's become a RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) solid waste? This is a concern that the USEPA is currently addressing. One rule of thumb seems to be that ordnance utilized for its intended purposes are not covered under RCRA. Firing ranges become solid waste mgmt sites that warrant RCRA corrective action because of the hazardous wastes from UXOs, and we might add, exploded ordnances including the numerous slugs manufactured from lead and copper. Each of these sites most probably, have literally tons of lead deposited in the revetments (which act as backstops for the spent ordnance!). Recycling these minerals would be the most expeditious and cost-effective methodology, n'est ce pas? The USEPA has a draft document available regarding RCRA UXOs that we believe pertains to an RRA (Relative Risk Assessment). The next presentation was by Al Hurt, Deputy West Coast interagency exec. for DON (Dept. of the Navy). Al spoke on the BRAC DoD budget update. In essence, he alluded to a important revision in the budget strategy. BCT or BRAC Clean-up Team priorities will be more reuse driven. There will be a "bias to clean-up" rather than studying a site to death. And a new emphasis or bias to "high relative risk," in other words, tackling that which is most hazardous to human health or potentially so. Basically Congress is not satisfied with the snail's pace that remediation has been on, and has therefore tried to build a fire under the regulators and DoD to expedite clean-up or expect to find BRAC and DERA funding cut to the bone. More later... Don Zweifel | |
Prev by Date: Re: News from Washington. Next by Date: ALERT! RAB TECH ASSISTANCE THREATEN | |
Prev by Thread: Re: June CFRs on CD-ROM Next by Thread: ALERT! RAB TECH ASSISTANCE THREATEN |