From: | gkripke@Essential.ORG |
Date: | 05 Dec 1995 16:26:57 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Budget Update. |
Posting from Gawain Kripke <gkripke@Essential.ORG> BEGIN UPDATE Economics for the Earth: A Friends of the Earth Update on issues linking People, Prosperity, and the Planet December 5, 1995 THE TAXING DETAILS OF RECONCILIATION Although not a traditional focus for environmentalists, Friends of the Earth is keeping a close eye on tax provisions of the Budget Reconciliation bill being negotiated by Congress and the White House. We have identified a number of provisions in the conference bill which will benefit polluting industries and also a number of provisions that encourage environmental clean-up and protection. Friends of the Earth is concerned that several of these provisions unfairly favor declining, polluting industries over growing, clean industries. This approach harms taxpayers twice -- once by using their dollars to subsidize capital intensive industries that harm our natural environment and twice in clean up costs. The offending tax provisions are: * exemption of commercial aviation fuels from the Transportation Fuels Tax -- gives preferential tax treatment to a significant contributor to air and water pollution by subsidizing the airline industry; * removing the business exclusion for energy subsidies provided by public utilities -- impedes programs set up by utilities to encourage installation of energy conservation equipment by businesses; * changing the coal industry retiree health equity provisions -- exempts irresponsible coal companies from paying their fair share of retired coal miner's insurance premiums; * extending the tax credit for fuel production from most nonconventional sources -- this fuel credit does not enhance energy security and results in groundwater and other environmental contamination, with a few exceptions (coalbed methane recovery, landfill gas capture and clean biomass technologies). * repealing or weakening the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax -- particularly benefits industries that deplete natural resources and pollute the environment. On the other hand, the Budget Reconciliation bill does contain a few tax items that have a potential environmental benefit, including: * extension of the Superfund excise taxes and corporate environmental income tax -- continues the "polluter-pay" principle for cleanup of toxic contaminations and requires that polluters bear the burden of cleanup; * reinstating the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund Excise Tax -- ensures that polluters rather than taxpayers pay for clean-up of oil spills; * phasing out the preferential tax treatment given to certain large farming corporations under the accrual accounting method -- originally designed to help "family" farmers, this tax benefit often also helps large chemical-intensive agribusiness; * allowing a forty percent estate tax exclusion for land dedicated for conservation purposes -- provides a good incentive for land protection near metropolitan areas, national parks, and designated wilderness areas. Two additional items of concern are the failure of Congress to renew the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund tax and exempting imported, recycled halons from the ozone depleting chemicals tax. The failure to renew the LUST Trust Fund tax will mean that the burden of cleaning up fuel leaking from thousands of underground storage tanks around the country will fall on taxpayers. Friends of the Earth supports extending this tax. In addition, the bill would exempt imported, recycled halons from the ozone depleting chemicals tax. This could provide an environmental benefit by displacing the need for production of virgin halons. However, the exemption could allow imported virgin halons to disguise themselves as recycled. This exemption requires strong efforts to monitor and enforce violations abroad in order to assure that illegal importing schemes do not arise. Many of these recommendations come from Friends of the Earth's 1995 report, Dirty Little Secrets which recommends eliminating $20 billion in tax breaks, loopholes and exemptions that benefit polluting industries. For further details, please call Courtney Cuff at 783-7400 (ext. 207). HOUSE HALTS GIVE-AWAYS: SINKS INTERIOR BILL AGAIN On November 15, the House of Representatives voted 230-199 to recommit the Interior Appropriations Conference Report because the bill included tremendous give-aways and anti- environmental riders. The two key issues on this vote were a devastating legislative rider mandating mismanagement of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska and weak legislative language on mining reform. The vote marked the second time this year that the House rejected the bill and sent the conference agreement back to the House-Senate negotiating committee. The Interior Appropriations bill provides annual funding for the Interior Department agencies such as the National Park Service and the Fish & Wildlife Service as well as some other miscellaneous government agencies. In September, the House recommitted the bill because it did not include a mining patent moratorium, which would prevent the Interior Department from giving away public lands with valuable minerals for almost nothing. The most recent version including a mining patent moratorium, but the legislative language provided a number of loopholes which would lift the moratorium. At stake are billions and billions of dollars worth of valuable gold, silver, and other minerals on public lands. The other key issue raised during debate on the bill was a legislative rider which would have enforced an outdated forest management plan for the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. The rider, championed by Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK), would have dictated levels of logging 44 percent higher that current levels and would have subverted efforts to improve the environmental management of the forest. The rider would have increased the level of taxpayer subsidy provided to timber companies logging the Tongass. From 1992 through 1994 the Tongass timber program cost taxpayers about $100 million more than it took in revenues. A re-revised bill is expected to hit the House again this week or next. | |
Prev by Date: NETWORK POSITION ON MUNITIONS RULE Next by Date: DEFENSE MONEY BILLS | |
Prev by Thread: NETWORK POSITION ON MUNITIONS RULE Next by Thread: DEFENSE MONEY BILLS |