From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 24 May 1996 16:52:18 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | BANG BOX |
From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> BANG BOX One of the Army's principal tools in justifying the open burning and detonation (OB/OD) of munitions and rockets has been the Bang Box, an inflatable 1000 cubic meter test chamber located at the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah. Formally, it is known as the Propellant, Explosive, and Pyrotechnic Thermal Treatment Evaluation and Test Facility. Instruments inside the Bang Box measure emissions from detonations and burns. Based upon a series of tests, the Army has concluded: "volatile and semivolatile organic compounds resulting from OB/OD of propellants, explosives, and energetic munitions are proving to be far below levels of environmental concern and do not pose a threat to health or the environment." The tests appear to be carried out in good faith. The Army has worked closely with U.S. EPA. Bang Box data has been correlated with data from field tests. But I find the conclusions counter-intuitive. The uncontrolled combustion of significant quantities of toxic substances must release significant quantities of toxic substances into the environment. When I originally read some of the bang box technical reports, I offered some general criticisms. But in reading some newer papers about the program, I am struck by a key fact that escaped me before: The Bang Box can test only 227 grams of bare explosives or 2.27 kilograms of bare propellants. It is quite conceivable that a small amount of pure material - that is, with no shell or casing - burns much better in the lab than during bulk disposal in the field. In fact, there have been reports that open detonations of waste munitions have actually thrown intact live munitions away from burn areas. I am sure that the proponents of OB/OD, who write confidently about the Bang Box results, believe that skepticism such as mine places a difficult burden of proof upon the Army. However, I believe that the potential risks are so great that this is exactly the type of activity that should be forced to prove itself, beyond a shadow of a doubt, before receiving permits. Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: Documents on Disk Next by Date: NAVAL WASTE | |
Prev by Thread: Documents on Disk Next by Thread: NAVAL WASTE |