From: | Kutak_R@ix.netcom.com |
Date: | 02 Sep 1996 13:31:39 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: PRESIDIO: FROM BRAC TO FUDS |
From: jagcret <Kutak_R@ix.netcom.com> Lenny: is the shift to FUDS for PSF unique to that base or is it a policy for the 88 base closures. If it is a policy for all of them , you will have a lot of support for your concern.I am presently working on a transfer for a later closure property and have been unable to get the service to commit that the funds would not be out of the FUDS account. The problem I see is the gross underfunding of FUDS. If there are going to be additional bases added to the FUDS program, then we will see increased competition for decreasing resources. BPS Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 17:18:23 -0700 From: jagcret <Kutak_R@ix.netcom.com> Lenny: is the shift to FUDS for PSF unique to that base or is it a policy for the 88 base closures. If it is a policy for all of them , you will have a lot of support for your concern. I am presently working on a transfer for a later closure property and have been unable to get the service to commit that the funds would not be out of the FUDS account. The problem I see is the gross underfunding of FUDS. If there are going to be additional bases added to the FUDS program, then we will see increased competition for decreasing resources. BPS | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: PRESIDIO: FROM BRAC TO FUDS Next by Date: Re: PRESIDIO: FROM BRAC TO FUDS | |
Prev by Thread: PRESIDIO: FROM BRAC TO FUDS Next by Thread: Re: PRESIDIO: FROM BRAC TO FUDS |