From: | David_Rubenson@rand.org (David Rubenson) |
Date: | 27 Jan 1997 14:01:11 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | No Subject |
I disagree with your assessment on a "Real Politics" basis. Past Congressional willingness to allocate large BRAC cleanup budgets has been motivated by the need for a political response to the economic dislocations of base closure. This, more than concern about environmental cleanup, has been the driver for cleanup budgets. As time has passed, communities have adjusted to (or been forced to accept) the loss in jobs and there is a reduced sense of political crisis. As urgency diminishes, so too will BRAC cleanup budgets. The key to ensuring adequate cleanup budgets is to offer something exciting; some means of breaking out of what may appear to some as a never ending process. An experiment that "reinvents government," demonstrates the ability of locals to manage their own cleanups, uses cleanup to create local jobs, etc.. An exciting idea is more likely to stimulate concern about environmental contamination than any concern that detailed regulatory protocols are not being met. I think that's the hard reality. | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: RPM COURSE in SF Next by Date: Federal Facility Cleanup Info | |
Prev by Thread: Highlights of the DERTF Conference Next by Thread: Re: Highlights of the DERTF Conference |