From: | Peter Strauss <pstrauss@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:32:50 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: CAL DSMOA $$$ |
To add to Lenny's concerns about the lack of funds allocated for state agencies, an interesting discussion took place at the last Moffett RAB. The general question was asked to a private PRP adjacent to Moffett whether it felt that the Navy was recieving the same requirements for cleanup and monitoring as were pribvate sites. Its answer was unequivably no - that private sites were held to a much higher standard. One of the state regulators responded that while there may be some truth to this claim, the reason the Navy is not held to the same standard is because DoD funds, throrugh DSMOA, regulatory oversight. Thereby, there is often a greater degree of comfort with some proposals by the DoD. In the case of private parties, the burden of proof is greater because of lack of familiarity. This is a quantifiable benefit of having strong and consistent regulatory obverrsight. Peter Strauss | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: RANGE RULE New Draft Next by Date: MOFFETT LANDFILL CONSOLIDATION | |
Prev by Thread: CAL DSMOA $$$ Next by Thread: Re: CAL DSMOA $$$ |