From: | "Sam Goodhope" <Sam.Goodhope@OAG.STATE.TX.US> |
Date: | 06 Jun 1997 16:05:42 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Tad McCall/Amherst Conference -Reply |
Please post if you want: I agree with Lenny re: Tad. He has been a shiny star in a rather dim federal facility nightscape. However, he appears to be barking up the wrong tree on this one. But, I don't know what activities the State was responsible for or for what exactly the federal government believes the State is responsible. I can say, however, that the federal facility NRD issue may soon become a big issue and that the number of cases where the states will have any responsibility will be minuscule. It is critical that the States get together to figure out a strategy for ensuring that the federal government does not shirk its NRD responsibilities either under the present law or through the backdoor by working through the Armed Services Committee staff. | |
Prev by Date: NORTH ISLAND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RFPs Next by Date: House Nat'l Security Com. Proposes to Amend Enviro St | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Tad McCall/Amherst Conference Next by Thread: The Myth of The CERCLA Covenant |