From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 1997 08:49:38 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | HR 1778 WEDNESDAY UPDATE |
UPDATE ON H.R. 1778, DEFENSE REFORM ACT Wednesday, June 18 We may be winning! Yesterday the chairman of House National Security Committee, Floyd Spence (R-S.C.), announced he would request that the environmental provisions (Title III) of the Defense Reform Act have a separate vote on the House floor from the rest of the defense reform bill. Most people take that as a sign that the provisions will be dropped and there will not be a vote. As most of you know, Title III of H.R. 1778 would rewrite the Superfund statutes and amend several other environmental laws. Some of the provisions would affect only Federal facilities, others would affect all cleanups. The bill was reported out of the House National Security Committee last week, after an amendment by Rep. John Spratt (D-S.C.) to strip out Title III was defeated on a party-line vote. Yesterday the committee held a four-hour hearing on the bill. (Yes, this was a hearing *after* the vote on the bill.) Witness included the Pentagon, GAO, Colorado Attorney General Gale Norton, a cleanup contractor from Colorado, and a law school professor. The environmentalists were not at the table because our two Superfund experts were both on vacation. A brief statement from nine national environmental organizations was summarized and entered into the record by the ranking Democrat, Rep. Ron Dellums (Calif.). The hearing was a success from our view point. The star witness was Colorado Attorney General Gale Norton, a Republican. In her testimony and her questions, she demonstrated a solid understanding of the program. Politically, her opposition to Title III made the Republican majority on the committee uncomfortable with what they were doing. The Pentagon's cleanup official, Sherri Goodman also made it clear she did not support the environmental provisions as written. The House committees that have jurisdiction over Superfund, Commerce Committee and Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, have started to weigh in and oppose H.R. 1778 this week. Next steps: The House Rules Committee will meet today, Wednesday, June 18 at 1 p.m. to consider the annual defense authorization bill. Rep. Spence is expected to ask that H.R. 1778 be offered as two floor amendments to the defense bill. One amendment would be the environmental provisions, the other would be the remaining procurement and personal sections of the bill. The Rules Committee is expected to issue its rule on the defense bill last this evening. It won't be publicly available until tomorrow morning. I expect that given the strong opposition and the limited time for floor amendments, Title III will be dropped in the Rules Committee and not come to a vote. The defense authorization bill will be on the House floor Thursday and Friday. In short, I think we will win the battle, but we won't know until tomorrow morning. | David Culp | E-mail: dculp@nrdc.org | | Plutonium Challenge | Tel. +1 (202) 289-2388 | | Washington, D.C. | Fax +1 (202) 289-1060 | | |
Prev by Date: "DEFENSE REFORM" AND RABS Next by Date: MINNESOTA A.G. LETTER RE 1778 | |
Prev by Thread: "DEFENSE REFORM" AND RABS Next by Thread: MINNESOTA A.G. LETTER RE 1778 |