From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Tue, 01 Jul 1997 11:37:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RAB "ADJOURNMENT" |
DRAFT RAB ADJOURNMENT GUIDANCE At the recent meeting of the Defense Environmental Response Task Force, the Defense Department presented ideas from its (still under development) draft guidance on the adjournment (termination) of Restoration Advisory Boards. I don't view this process as controversial. In my experience, community representatives don't want to continue attending meetings after their work is done. The draft guidance reportedly explains: Some of the situations when it is appropriate for RABs to adjourn occur when the following situations apply: * when an installation no longer has an environmental restoration program * when all environmental restoration decisions have been made final * when all remedies are in place and operating properly and successfully * when the base closure cleanup team has dissolved * when there is no longer, sufficient, sustained community interest Lenny Siegel |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Re: Support for SecDef's empowerment via sec. 363 Next by Date: Re: Such Nonsense! | |
Prev by Thread: 2,000 ACRES TO RETURN TO NATIVE AMERICANS Next by Thread: Re: RAB "ADJOURNMENT" |