From: | LocInc@aol.com |
Date: | 09 Jul 1997 13:05:56 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Military's Attitude Towards Environmental Cleanup |
In response to Paul Zanis, and others on the CareerPro list, Paul wrote: "I don't know where you get your info but no progress has been made at the mmr only alot of money spent. We have a bad situation getting worse." I worked for Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., for 3 years managing a program with Martin Marietta Energy Systems Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program (HAZWRAP) to accomplish "work for others," primarily DoD clients. HAZWRAP managed the work (too much management at too much expense) and M&E accomplished it. We were one of several environmental firms doing work at MMR. One of my project managers in the Boston office (now working for the Mass. regulators) convinced MMR to close out some 200 sumps (this was several years ago and I forget the exact number) and clean-up adjacent soils contaminated with petroleum products using the type of "screen as you dig" technique commonly employed in underground storage tank projects for gas stations. This approach probably saved MMR a couple million dollars that they had planned to spend for a Remedial Investigation approach to the problem. M&E could have gone along with the original approach and reaped huge profits, but the team was really interested in getting the work done in the fastest most cost-effective manner. One of the biggest problems with cleaning up contamination at military bases is that regulatory restrictions and guidance, plus government contracting regulations, often force entities to spend their money doing much more characterization than necessary or to assume a fixed amount of cleanup to be accomplished so a fixed price can be placed on it (often a lousy assumption that later can't be easily modified). If you can begin to overcome these institutional hurdles and move towards presumed remedies, design-build projects, interim actions, and other quick & easy solutions, cleanups will become cheaper, and ultimately more effective because they are initiated sooner and the money saved will go further. Susan Gawarecki, Executive Director ORR Local Oversight Committee | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: DOD's ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD Next by Date: Re: REPLIES TO TED HENRY | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Military's Attitude Towards Environmental Cleanup Next by Thread: Re: Military's Attitude Towards Environmental Cleanup |