From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Tue, 08 Jul 1997 17:40:18 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | FEDS COMPROMISE ON RANGE RULE |
RANGE RULE COMPROMISE AMONG FEDERAL AGENCIES The July 1, 1997 issue of DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL ALERT reported that federal agencies have resolved their differences over the Range Rule, which the Defense Department will officially propose later this year (as early as this summer) to govern the identification and remediation of closed munitions impact ranges. The two major federal land management agencies - the Departments of Interior and Agriculture - had been pushing for some time to win assurances that the Defense Department would return to conduct (and pay for) additional cleanup should new uses - such as the construction of pipelines, campgrounds, or visitor centers - require more clearance to protect public safety. There is no public language yet, but from what I have been able to find out there are four key new points in the agreement: 1) If land use is limited by the initial absence of a technology to clear unexploded ordnance, the Defense Department will revisit the remedy when better technologies are available. That is, the "reasonably anticipated future land use" will not be determined by the initial response. 2) If transfer to another federal agency is NOT mandated by law, and the prospective federal recipient rejects the Defense Department's remediation strategy, Defense may look for another federal agency to take the property or simply retain it. 3) DOD may determine that a remedy (or response) "fails" if too many people move close to munitions-contaminated ranges, and thus be required to develop a new, more protective response. 4) If the land management agencies want to upgrade the use of munitions-contaminated areas and Defense doesn't agree, the Office of Management and the Budget will facilitate a decision based upon criteria such as the importance of the proposed new use, the availability of alternative parcels of property, and the size of the remediation budget. EPA will play a part in any such resolution. Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: Bases & Re-use Innovations Next by Date: James Connell's Questions | |
Prev by Thread: Bases & Re-use Innovations Next by Thread: James Connell's Questions |