From: | marianne.thaeler@sfsierra.sierraclub.org |
Date: | 16 Dec 1997 10:42:53 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Airspace |
Reply from Marianne: No, military training routes are NOT tied to DOD's ownership of land beneath it. Most training routes are not over DOD owned lands. If you look at FAA general aviation maps of western States, in very fine print or by reference in very fine print, you also see Cruise Missile Corridors, most - if not all now abandoned, criss crossing the country. I discovered this when reading my FAA maps with a magnifying glass for ground features one day. Marianne .From Henry: I have heard of owning airspace, and it has been described to me as "up to infinity". The leasing or selling of this space is new to me; I had been given the impression that the military ownership of airspace would be tied to DoD's ownership of the land beneath it. I know permission must be obtained to fly in such air space, so in exchange for such permission there may be a fee - hence, this could be leasing. I unfortunately am not familiar with the law that gives the military sky ownership, and the requirements associated with this ownership, but I assume that one of the many military representatives on this listserver will be responding to your request on this level. I also think it may be good for others on this list to be given a bit more information about where this foreign training is taking place, as well as the expansions you speak of. Hope all is well Sincerely Ted Henry | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Low Level Airspace Next by Date: Re: Response to lawsuit re Atsugi NAS | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Airspace Next by Thread: Re: Airspace |