From: | Marylia Kelley <marylia@igc.org> |
Date: | 16 Dec 1997 10:49:01 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | US/nuke summaries/Citiizen's Watch |
PRINT BITES: All the News That Fits to Print by Marylia Kelley from Tri-Valley CAREs December 1997 newsletter, Citizen's Watch ** More Plutonium Violations. Last month we published news of the 15 criticality violations committed by Livermore Lab during its preparation of the underground "subcritical" nuclear test, HOLOG. This month Tri-Valley CAREs learned there has been a new plutonium criticality violation at Livermore. The word is that essentially all operations are now shut down in the plutonium facility, and that the Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board has just quietly completed an inspection. We have document requests into both DOE and DNFSB, and will update you when we obtain their reports. Additionally, we have heard there is more to the story on the 15 prior criticality violations than was written in the Lab's report. Stay tuned! ** Ron, You Will be Missed. Rep. Ronald V. Dellums (D-Oakland) recently announced he will retire effective this coming February after serving 27 years in Congress. We wish him the best of luck in his post-Congressional life, and hope that he can give nuclear weapons a swift kick in the, uh, budget before leaving office. ** Nuclear Bay Area. Kudos to S.F. Examiner reporters Erin McCormick and Jane Kay for their 3-part series on nuclear hazards in our communities, including a profile of Livermore Lab. Copies available on request. ** NYT Takes on SSM. In its lead editorial on Nov. 30, the New York Times cautiously but firmly took the Dept. of Energy and the labs to task over the so-called "Stockpile Stewardship" program. In calling for an alternatives analysis, the editorial echoes a main theme in our current lawsuit challenging the program. The newspaper concludes, "...the stewardship program must not subsidize unrelated experimentation or allow any effort to design and build more advanced weapons. The Congressional Budget Office has proposed less expensive ways to assure weapons reliability. One approach would be to consolidate the work at one of the existing labs and do without the [national] ignition facility... Congress, whose budget ax is so keen on social programs, owes taxpayers a disinterested study to determine how far the stewardship program can safely be cut." (Hint: the correct answer is-far.) ** Homeland Defense? The National Defense Panel released a report calling on the U.S. to spend $5 billion to $10 billion a year to develop new weapons and warfighting concepts as a "hedge" against unforeseen changes in global security. The panel, created by Congress with its members appointed by Secretary of Defense William Cohen, suggested crafting new, high-tech military responses to potential 21st Century domestic threats, such as terrorist attacks. The panel concluded the Pentagon should put itself in the position to create an anti-missile defense over the U.S. (Star Wars revised) "once we get a better idea of what the threats are," according to one member. On a more positive note, the panel said the current structuring of U.S. forces to fight two major foreign wars at the same time was overblown, and it endorsed a lower limit for U.S. nuclear weapons. ** Leaking Waste. The DOE had long claimed that the 54 million gallons of deadly wastes held in 177 underground tanks-about 67 of which are thought to be leaking- at the Hanford reservation would not reach groundwater. Well, it's there. New studies confirm radioactive waste from the tanks has reached the water table 230 feet below. Next stop, Columbia River? ** Livermore Health Studies. Thanks to advocacy by the community members of an advisory "site team" (including Tri-Valley CAREs), the DOE has reinstated some monies for the CA state health department and the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry to continue assessing the effects of the Livermore Lab on the health of the surrounding community. If you are a Livermore resident wishing to get involved, please give us a call. Public participation is our aim. |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: NID Action memo/Citizen's Watch Next by Date: Re: Airspace | |
Prev by Thread: NID Action memo/Citizen's Watch Next by Thread: Re: US/nuke summaries/Citiizen's Watch |