From: | Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 1998 15:08:55 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: CERCLA Exemptions |
Peter, You are correct that Oakland Army Base is not listed on the NPL, but I believe the majority of CERCLA sites are not. The DOD has generally committed to following CERCLA policies for its sites. You are correct that the State is the lead regulatory agency at the Oakland Army Base. But the Army is the lead agency and both the EPA and state are in advisory roles only - as at every base where no Federal Facilities and Site Restoration Agreement has been signed to establish different rules. The only legal power the state and EPA have is to refuse to sign the ROD for the cleanup - thus delaying land transfer. At Fort Benjamin Harrison, the State of Indiana warned the local reuse authority that if they accepted transfer of some lead contaminated property the Army refused to cleanup, the local agency would then be responsible for cleaning up the lead. Appreciate your response. And the State angle is worth pursuing - but the State role to date has been extremely weak at the Oakland Army Base. Bill Smith Sierra Club Federal Facilities Task Force | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Lead in Soil at Oakland Army Base Next by Date: Year End Report on Philippine Base Cleanup Campaign | |
Prev by Thread: Re: CERCLA Exemptions Next by Thread: Re: CERCLA Exemptions |