From: | Peter Strauss <pstrauss@igc.org> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 1998 15:23:30 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: CERCLA Exemptions |
At 10:39 PM 2/20/98 EST, WJASmith@aol.com wrote: >Peter, > >You are correct that Oakland Army Base is not listed on the NPL, but I believe >the majority of CERCLA sites are not. The DOD has generally committed to >following CERCLA policies for its sites. > Bill, I'm not sure that you are correct that DoD has generally committed to following CERCLA policies for its sites. Can anyone clarify? Also, by definition, a CERCLA site is one listed on the NPL. An issue that I was responding to is whether lead contamination, if derived from fuel, is exempted from CERCLA. Petroleum contamination is exempted, except in circumstances where petroleum is a co-contaminant and its remediation affects the remediation of other contaminants. At Moffett, although the RAB is presented with documents regarding the petroleum contamination, it is clear that the corrective action plan for petroleum is not regulated under CERCLA and will not be part of the CERCLA ROD. Peter | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Does CERCLA exemption exist for lead in soil deposited by au Next by Date: Re: CERCLA Exemptions | |
Prev by Thread: Re: CERCLA Exemptions Next by Thread: Re: CERCLA Exemptions |