From: | Center for Public Environmental Oversight <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 22 May 1998 11:10:34 -0700 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Is fog oil an environmental and healthproblem? |
The below referenced EA for Guard training is for the use of 66,000 gallons of fog oil, light mineral oil, per year to create obscurant clouds for chemical warfare training. The obscurant is vaporized by contact with the exhaust gas of a pulse jet engine, however, the obscurant cloud is not a combustion product. They will use bladders and tankers. Starting this spring-summer, mobile source battlefield smoke generators will be used to create tactical smoke clouds using fog oil to screen friendly actions against agressor positions. Units will generate smoke for a duration of two hours or less for each event. The obscurant and devices used to produce the obscurant are not unproven technologies, so they say. The US Army Chemical school has produced extensive Standard Operating Procedures on the use and effects of fog oil both in the US and abroad, they say. All this according to the below referenced EA. This training is to be, and presently is being, done at the Dona Ana Range, New Mexico, of Ft. Bliss Texas/NM right over the Texas state line in New Mexico. Of concern to local low income minority communities in the area, is that this has already been done, and the clouds drifted off the training range creating haze that required initial consideration of an emergency response. According to sources working for the State of New Mexico local Environmental Quality Office, the military training was beomg conducted by contractors, and these training contractors were fined. The EA references a short 1995 letter from the New Mexico Enviro Dept to Ft. Bliss, saying that FT. Bliss is not at Title V major source of pollution and not subject to 20 NMAC 2.70 permit requirement (sorry haven't a clue what this means) but gather this is being taken as an OK to do this training. Mitigations, well they don't call them such, rather they are stated factually as "we will's", monitor for atmospheric inversions and only train with this stuff when there are inversions. This is rather unbelievable, as inversions are what force pollutants to the ground onto troops, and publics in adjacent areas. But may be this is what they want for realistic training. Oh, it is stated that they are simulating Southwest Asia conditions. Sorry folks, I'm a lands activist, but this looks bad to me. And I am unsure of what Club should do if anything. I did call and alert the State Environment Dept Air Quality monitoring officers. They indicated that since my initial hoopla a while back over interstate, intra air shed concerns, Texas and NM AGs offices are now talking to each other. It appears to me that this EA raises three issues, EQ-AIR, EQ-Environmental Justice, and what is going on? contract training? and all that is done when they foul up is get a fine??? Environmental Assessment for Rio Bravo Combined Foreces Training Exercise, Fort Bliss, Texas 1998to 2003 for 460th Chemical Brigade, North Little Rock, AR; 323rd Engineer Company, El Paso, TX; 285th Engineer Company, Baton Rouge, LA; 420th Engineer Brigade, Bryan TX. April 1998 Contact person, and requests for copies of the document to: Cambell Ingram USAADACENFB Attn:ATZC-DOE(Ingram) Fort Bliss, Texas 79916-6816 phone 915-568-3908 Marianne | |
Prev by Date: UXO Report Executive Summary Next by Date: Reply: Is fog oil an environmental and health problem? | |
Prev by Thread: UXO Report Executive Summary Next by Thread: Reply: Is fog oil an environmental and health problem? |