From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Tue, 07 Jul 1998 23:54:39 -0700 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Institutional Controls & the Constitution |
Subject: Institutional Controls: The Current Insanity of Environmental No Action! Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 21:34:30 -0500 From: Steven Pollack <themissinglink@eznetinc.com> Reply-To: steve@familyjeweler.com Organization: The Missing Link To: lsiegel@cpeo.org (Lenny, please post) Yes, lets just fence off all the sections of the United States which contain contamination. Lets destroy future freedoms of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness on (X)% of the USA. Is 5% acceptable? 10%, 20%, 30%? Again we reduce environmental hazards to local issues when we had just begun to understand that they are regional and global in nature. I can just imagine that the cost/benefit analysis in just about every Feasibility Study will conclude that $10,000 of fencing is advantageous and preferable to expensive and uncertain remediation. The fact that the capping option is currently the order of the day is proof that the regulators take the path of least resistance, least expense, and least environmental remediation. Insofar as institutional controls apply to military installations, I believe the Third Amendment to the Constitution would prohibit this as a long term solution. I begin this discussion with part of Lenny Siegel's message today: "5. In several sections of the Manual, the work group discusses takings and compensation issues. Although it is appropriate to identify the issue, the discussions of these issues should indicate that takings would not necessarily occur and compensation would not necessarily be required. The current language implies that any time a regulator imposes a use restriction, such restriction would effect a takings. The current state of the law, however, does not support such a conclusion. Rather, some case law indicates that it is the contamination, and not the regulatory action, that effects the loss of use and value." The Third Amendment states: "No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war but in a manner to be prescribed by law." This Constitutional Amendment is not about whether the Army has the right to use your house during wartime. They do have that right under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. They can condemn your property under Eminent Domain and kick you out with "just compensation". What the Third Amendment addresses is the scope of intrusion, and interference, of the Army, into the lives of private citizens. Institutional controls are a barrier to LIBERTY! Liberty of ourselves and our posterity are guaranteed in the preamble to the Constitution. I ask each of you to look up liberty in your dictionary. Every one of the definitions is contrary to institutional controls. Institutional controls abridge Americans' rights of land ownership and freedom of movement. Protecting toxic waste from human contact is not the public use which is the precondition for condemnation under the Fifth Amendment. Clean it up! You may say to yourselves that I am taking this to an excessive interpretation of the Constitution. Is free speech taken to an excessive interpretation as applied to campaign contributions? Is illegal search and seizure taken to an excessive interpretation when criminals are let off on technicalities of probable cause? Is cruel and unusual punishment interpretation excessive when it demands television in prison and better health care than the average working person? I am tired of hearing that the protective missions of the military mitigate their guilt in being the worst environmental offender in the country. There is nothing more un-American than polluting America and poisoning Americans! Nothing besides erecting a fence as the final remediation of their toxic contamination! Steven Pollack steve@familyjeweler.com http://www.familyjeweler.com/fortweb.htm Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Institutional Controls - AG comments Next by Date: Re: Institutional Controls & the Constitution | |
Prev by Thread: Institutional Controls - AG comments Next by Thread: Re: Institutional Controls & the Constitution |