From: | Steven Pollack <themissinglink@eznetinc.com> |
Date: | Tue, 18 May 1999 09:35:42 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Fort Ord RAB |
"3. The Fort Ord RAB has repeatedly been mired in procedural disputes. In 1997, we (CPEO) were invited in to mediate. After some initial success, our efforts broke down. In October, 1997 we recommended the suspension of the Fort Ord RAB. Back in 1997 we posted our reports on this listserver, so I will not re-post them know. If you want copies of our reports, please check CPEO's Web archive, or e-mail me a request." Lenny, This paragraph is very disturbing to me. Are you saying that because the RAB and the Army cannot see eye to eye on procedural matters, that you personally reccomended the RAB's suspension? That seems so out of character for you. I have a longstanding dispute with the Army's plans to cap Landfill 7 and I do not feel like the communities comments were effectively or substantively addressed in the Army responses in the FS. Would you advocate disbanding the RAB here also because the Army chooses to do what they want regardless of public opinion? Why not disband the BRAC process and give control over to the citizens who will live with the toxins? Why do you come down on the RAB for a failure to agree? Steven Pollack | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Toxic Effects of NATO War Next by Date: Munitions Issues | |
Prev by Thread: Fort Ord RAB Next by Thread: Fort Ord RAB |