From: | Marsden and June Chen <doobage@localnet.com> |
Date: | Sun, 1 Aug 1999 10:12:56 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Sunflower Army Munitions Plant - FOSET |
Under CERCLA 120(h), approval of the FOSET must be done jointly by the Governor of the State and the Regional Administrator of the USEPA. This should be done after review of the technical documents which should describe the hazardous areas of concern a the facility, and the future plans of the Army even after transfer of the property. In approving the FOSET, the Gov. and Administr. will be confirming that hazardous conditions exist at the site, no remedial actions have been taken but transfer may take place without undue potential for impacts on human health and the environment. Thirty days for public comment on the FOSET is clearly insuffucient and an extension should be sought from both regulatory agencies. Apart from all the important documents that will certainly be generated for the FOSET, probably the most important item to be considered is the remedy of the site and the Army's feet should be held to the fire for doing this. Moreover, the Army should be held responsible for any existing hazardous conditions not yet discovered but which could come to light at a later date. Both the State and EPA should agree on the type of tripartite document that will describe the Army's future responsibilities - a kiss and a goodbye will not do it. It might be difficult in getting the Army to agree to a legal document and the most that it may agrre to is a promisory letter. |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Sunflower FOSET Next by Date: Off-Base Sampling | |
Prev by Thread: Sunflower FOSET Next by Thread: Re: Sunflower Army Munitions Plant - FOSET |