From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Sun, 19 Sep 1999 13:08:57 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques |
I believe I picked a bad example of a Congrssionally ordered property transfer. The Patuxent wildlife refuge remained in federal hands, so Section 120(h) of CERCLA did not come into play. In that case, it was the Department of Interior whose hands were tied by the mandated transfer. I believe, however, that there are cases where Congress ordered transfers of contaminated property to non-federal entities. Perhaps someone on the list can come up with some examples and explain how Section 120(h) requirements were resolved. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques Next by Date: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques | |
Prev by Thread: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques Next by Thread: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques |