From: | "Marty Walters" <marty_walters@terrasano.com> |
Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:42:30 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques |
What about Stockton Naval Communications Center -- wasn't that a special legislation transfer? I don't know whether it has been officially transferred yet to the City of Stockton. ---------- >From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> >To: aimeeh@cpeo.org, cpeo-military@igc.org >Subject: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques >Date: Sun, Sep 19, 1999, 9:34 AM > > I believe I picked a bad example of a Congrssionally ordered property > transfer. The Patuxent wildlife refuge remained in federal hands, so > Section 120(h) of CERCLA did not come into play. In that case, it was > the Department of Interior whose hands were tied by the mandated > transfer. > > I believe, however, that there are cases where Congress ordered > transfers of contaminated property to non-federal entities. Perhaps > someone on the list can come up with some examples and explain how > Section 120(h) requirements were resolved. > > Lenny > -- > > > Lenny Siegel > Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight > c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 > Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 > Fax: 650/968-1126 > lsiegel@cpeo.org > http://www.cpeo.org > > | |
Prev by Date: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques Next by Date: NEW! ON THE WEB! FROM TRI-VALLEY CAREs | |
Prev by Thread: Re: AK Senator Introduces Legislation on Vieques Next by Thread: NEW! ON THE WEB! FROM TRI-VALLEY CAREs |