From: | Pauline Simon <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 1999 01:13:14 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Delahunt takes on Section 8149 |
[Posted by Lenny Siegel. I am sorry if this turns out to be a duplicate. I can't confirm that the original went out to the list, and it's time-sensitive. - Lenny] -From the Office of Congressman Bill Delahunt (D-Massachusetts) For Immediate Release: October 22, 1999 DELAHUNT URGES CLINTON VETO OF DOD APPROPS BILL Rider Would Gut Environmental Enforcement at MMR, Nationally Washington, DC -- Congressman Bill Delahunt today urged President Clinton to veto a pending appropriations bill because of a provision, slipped into the measure at the eleventh hour, which would gut environmental enforcement at the Massachusetts Military Reservation and across the nation. The two-line provision -- which never arose during relevant House or Senate hearings -- appeared only after both chambers completed consideration of the FY2000 Defense Department appropriation. The anti-environmental rider was added during joint conference deliberations convened to work out differences between the two versions. The bill, which Delahunt opposed on the House floor, is now on the President's desk. The provision would effectively shield the Pentagon from fines or penalties for violations of environmental standards. It would be effective for the duration of fiscal year 2000, which runs until September 30 -- which Delahunt said "is like unilaterally disarming the police." "An essential part of our collective momentum has been the consensus which derived from public confidence in the commitment and capacity of federal enforcement mechanisms," the Delahunt letter stated. "A blanket exemption, as contained in the Defense Appropriations rider, would irresponsibly degrade that confidence -- and disrupt the pace of work toward understanding the scope of the remediation challenge." "With the DOD measure now on your desk, I urge you to weigh the consequences of this rider on public health for Cape Cod and across the country," he wrote. "For my part, this provision made it impossible to support the overall appropriations bill on the House floor; if it becomes law, I will devote myself to its repeal next year. In my view, its prohibitions would cut the teeth -- and heart -- out of environmental enforcement, on the state as well as federal levels." -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] NPL listing timelines Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Former NAS Alameda | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] NPL listing timelines Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Former NAS Alameda |