From: | Pauline Simon <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:23:35 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Section 8149 |
<------ Original Message Follows ------> From: "Wade, Janet DES" <wadej@riley.army.mil> To: "'cpeo@cpeo.org'" <cpeo@cpeo.org> Subject: RE: Section 8149 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 18:02:21 -0500 This message came from Janet Wade: I urge everyone to read this provision carefully and also to seek clarification of it's actual intent and meaning. I'm highlighting below what I believe are key phrases which may be being overlooked and/or misunderstood. "None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be used for the payment of a fine or penalty that is imposed against the Department of Defense or a military department arising from an environmental violation at a military installation or facility unless the payment of the fine or penalty has been specifically authorized by law." I am not a lawyer , but based on my experience, I believe this means that Congress intends that payment of fines or penalties (unless otherwise specifically authorized) be included in future appropriations as line items - i.e. that Congress be aware of (the violation) and authorize such payments. As a line item, the name of the installation/entity, the amount of the fine/penalty, and probably also the nature of the violation is included in an appropriations act. This brings visibility to the payment and does not serve to avoid the payment of the fine/penalty. This high level of visibility, in itself, can act as an added incentive to comply (or stated bluntly, be a disincentive to incurring fines/penalties). Fines/penalties not otherwise "specifcally authorized by law" may include penalties incurred under Federal Facility Agreements or other Inter-agency Agreements (IAGs) between DoD entities and the EPA which are enforceable, but do not carry the weight of "law". This provision' may delay payment of a fine/penalty to a future fiscal year due to the timing of the budget cycle - but the payment should eventually be made. But - it is not necessarily 'anti-environmental' or 'shield the Pentagon' ---- <------ End Of Original Message -------> You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Congressional Approval of Fines Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] NAAG letter re Section 8149 | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Congressional Approval of Fines Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] NAAG letter re Section 8149 |