From: | Pauline Simon <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:41:19 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] NAAG letter re Section 8149 |
<------ Original Message Follows ------> From: "Dan Miller" <dan.miller@state.co.us> Subject: NAAG letter re Section 8149 [This letter was posted to the listserve by Dan Miller] "I thought you might want to post this letter that was sent today." NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATTORNEYS GENERAL 750 FIRST STREET NE SUITE 1100 WASHINGTON, DC 20002 (202) 326-6054 (202) 408-6999 CHRISTINE T. MILLIKEN PRESIDENT Executive Director CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE General Counsel Attorney General of Washington October 28, 1999 PRESIDENT-ELECT ANDREW KETTERER Attorney General of Maine VICE PRESIDENT CARLA J. STOVALL Attorney General of Kansas IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT MIKE MOORE Attorney General of Mississippi The Honorable Trent Lott Majority Leader United States Senate The Capitol, S-230 Washington, D.C. 20510-1601 The Honorable Thomas Daschle Minority Leader United States Senate The Capitol, S-221 Washington, D.C. 20510-7010 The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert Speaker United States House of Representatives The Capitol, H-232 Washington, D.C. 20515-6501 The Honorable Richard Gephardt Minority Leader United States House of Representatives The Capitol, H-204 Washington, D.C. 20515-6502 Re: Section 8145, Defense Appropriations Legislation Dear Senators Lott and Daschle; and Representatives Hastert and Gephardt: We write to express our concern with a provision of the fiscal year 2000 Defense Appropriations bill. Section 8149 appears to be intended to prevent funds in the appropriations bill from being used to pay any penalty imposed under an environmental law. While the language of this provision is somewhat ambiguous, such an interpretation by the federal government could operate as a de facto repeal of the Federal Facility Compliance Act for the Department of Defense. We believe this would have an adverse impact of federal facilities' compliance with state and federal environmental laws, and we urge you to work for the repeal of section 8149. The federal government is, and has long been, the nation's largest polluter. Federal agencies have pushed the doctrine of sovereign immunity to avoid having to comply with the mandates of state and federal environmental laws. For decades now, states have worked hard to ensure that federal agencies were subject to the same environmental laws as private parties. In 1992, the states succeeded in obtaining passage of the Federal Facility Compliance Act. October 28, 1999 Page Two This Act clarified the existing waiver of sovereign immunity in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and subjected federal agencies to state-imposed penalties for violating state hazardous waste laws. In 1996, Congress approved a similar clarification in the Safe Drinking Water Act. The threat of penalty liability has had a powerful deterrent effect, resulting in improved federal agency compliance with hazardous waste laws. States have been responsible in exercising their authority under the Federal Facility Compliance Act. The amount of penalties assessed against federal agencies in any given year has been modest. In addition, States often allow federal agencies to perform "supplemental environmental projects" in lieu of paying cash penalties. In these cases, the federal dollars directly fund environmental improvements that would not otherwise have occurred. Compliance generally results in pollution prevention, which helps to conserve taxpayers' dollars. Section 8149 could be interpreted by federal agencies to strip States of the power to penalize the Department of Defense in the coming year. In so doing, such an interpretation would place federal facilities above the law, further eroding public confidence in government. As described above, Section 8149 would impair a valuable tool that States have used responsibly and effectively to improve federal agencies' compliance with State hazardous waste laws. Again, we urge you to work to repeal this section as expeditiously as possible. Sincerely, Attorney General of Washington Christine Gregoire President, NAAG Attorney General of Colardo Ken Salazar Attorney General of Idaho Alan G. Lance Attorney General of Ohio Betty D. Montgomery cc: Senator Ted Stevens Chairman Committee on Appropriations Senator Robert C. Byrd Ranking Member Committee on Appropriations Senator George V. Voinovich Member Committee on Environment and Public Works Senator Max S. Baucus Ranking Member Committee on Environment and Public Works Senator John Warner Chairman Committee on Armed Services Senator Carl Levin Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services Representative C. W. Young Chairman Committee on Appropriations Representative David R. Obey, Ranking Member Committee on Appropriations Representative Bob Stump Chairman Committee on Armed Services Representative Ike Skelton Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services Representative W. J. Tauzin Chairman Committee on Commerce Representative John D. Dingell Ranking Member Committee on Commerce <------ End Of Original Message -------> You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Section 8149 Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Tracking EOD Incidents | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Section 8149 Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Tracking EOD Incidents |