From: | john.hopping@langley.af.mil |
Date: | Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:36:16 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] ECOS Opposes Section 8149 |
ECOS should be more careful in their analysis of congressional language and not taint their efforts with generalities. Terms such as "extremely judicious", "worst violators", "must live by the same standards", and "exempting military from enforcement", are all dubious phrases in my opinion, and only serve to worsen relations. Military installations are still subject to fines and penalties as before and most fines go to the states. Military installations are not exempt as stated by ECOS. 8149 changes the rules but not the end result. 8149 says that congress has to approve the funds to pay the fines. This is my opinion and does not represent the views of anyone else. You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. _____________________________________________________________ We've got email newsletters galore! Check 'em out at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/5 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] ECOS Opposes Section 8149 Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] ECOS Opposes Section 8149 | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] ECOS Opposes Section 8149 Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] ECOS Opposes Section 8149 |