From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:04:22 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Who Decides What? |
As I hear things, the Defense Department is willing to concede authority over "environmental" issues at munitions ranges to EPA and state regulators, but it want to retain final authority over "explosives safety" decisions. With such authority, it expects to trump the requirements that environmental regulators attempt to impose at sites with live ordnance. I am willing to accept Explosives Safety Board jurisdiction over narrowly defined explosives safety issues. For example, these are the officials who should decide when it's safe to move a piece of unexploded ordnance (UXO), but I think there is a third category: explosive risk management. Ultimate authority over safety issues should not be seen as the same as the power to select remedies. The Defense Department clearly has the expertise in the area of explosives safety, but range remediation is not the same as explosive ordnance disposal. In fact, one of the biggest problems with the military UXO program is that it has built the program - technology, process, contracting, etc. - from explosives ordnance disposal. But the two missions are not the same. Risk management decisions, such as how deep to clear an area, should be made by regulators, not the parties responsible for creating (and liable for cleaning up) the mess. If I ran the circus, I would make a list of decisions associated with a typical Range/UXO response project, and I would assign final decision-making authority for each item to either the Defense Department or the appropriate regulators. Ideally, everyone would reach consensus and one would never have to get to the final dispute-resolving level. But "who ultimately decides what" needs to be established up front. List of typical UXO decisions: How large an area should be sampled for UXO? - regulators Should a piece of UXO be detonated in place because it's unsafe to move? - Defense To what depth should clearance be conducted? - regulators What type of access controls should be put in place at a site? - regulators Should specific groups of people be allowed onto a site in its current condition? - Defense What level of training should a UXO technician have to work on a site? - Defense (perhaps shared with occupational safety and health agencies) Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com _______________________________________________________ Follow the U.S. presidential race on our Politics list! http://www.topica.com/lists/politics | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Nomans Standard Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] California Failing to do Its Job at Depot written by Grace Po | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Nomans Standard Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] California Failing to do Its Job at Depot written by Grace Po |